RESUMO
Objetivo: Estimar o custo da sequência de tratamento considerando as terapias com niraparibe e bevacizumabe, respectivamente, como terapias de manutenção de 1L e 2L para pacientes com câncer de ovário (CO) epitelial com deficiência de recombinação homóloga (HRD) e BRCA selvagem (BRCAwt) em um horizonte temporal de cinco anos, sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde suplementar brasileiro. Métodos: Foi desenvolvido um modelo de sobrevida particionado com três transições de estados de saúde, considerando os seguintes regimes em 1L e 2L, respectivamente: carboplatina + paclitaxel seguido de terapia de manutenção com niraparibe; carboplatina + gencitabina + bevacizumabe seguido pela continuação de bevacizumabe. As posologias em bula e as curvas de sobrevida livre de progressão dos respectivos estudos pivotais em cada uma das linhas terapêuticas foram utilizadas na análise, e o custo de tratamento foi calculado a partir da lista oficial de preços de medicamentos da CMED de abril de 2023. Resultados: O custo em 1L e 2L foi de BRL 868.830 e BRL 403.407, totalizando BRL 1.272.237 em um horizonte temporal de cinco anos, com 2,28 e 0,52 anos de vida livre de progressão, respectivamente, na 1L e 2L, com o total de 2,8 anos. Conclusões: O resultado da análise de custo de sequência de tratamento de câncer de ovário HRD/BRCAwt apresentou um custo total estimado de BRL 1.272.237, com 2,8 anos de vida livre de progressão. Essa análise contribui no entendimento dos custos e da eficácia esperada com o uso da terapia de manutenção de niraparibe em 1L e bevacizumabe em 2L em um horizonte temporal de cinco anos.
Objective: To estimate the cost of the treatment sequence, considering the maintenance therapies niraparib and bevacizumab, respectively, as maintenance therapies in 1L and 2L for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) over a 5-year time horizon from the perspective of the Brazilian supplementary health system. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed with three health state transitions, considering the following regimens in the 1L and 2L, respectively: carboplatin + paclitaxel followed by maintenance therapy with niraparib; carboplatin + gemcitabine + bevacizumab followed by the continuation of bevacizumab. The product's label and progression-free survival curves from the respective pivotal studies in each of the therapeutic lines were used in the analysis and the cost of treatment was calculated using as a reference the official CMED drug price list from April 2023. Results: The cost in 1L and 2L was BRL 868,830 and BRL 403,407, totaling BRL 1,272,237 over a 5-year period, with 2.28 and 0.52 years of progression-free survival, respectively in 1L and 2L, with a total of 2.8 years. Conclusions: The result of the analysis of the cost of the treatment sequence of ovarian cancer HRD/BRCAwt presented an estimated total cost of 1,272,237 with 2.8 year of progression-free survival. This analysis contributes to understand the expected cost and effectiveness with the use of maintenance therapy niraparib in 1L and bevacizumab in 2L over a 5-year time horizon.
RESUMO
Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy for GTN treatment after methotrexate-resistance or in cases of multiresistant disease, through a systematic review, as well as to present the first 4 Brazilian cases of immunotherapy for GTN treatment. Methods Three independent researchers searched five electronic databases (EMBASE, LILACS, Medline, CENTRAL and Web of Science), for relevant articles up to February/2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023401453). The quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale for case series and case reports. The primary outcome of this study was the occurrence of complete remission. The presentation of the case reports was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Results Of the 4 cases presented, the first was a low-risk GTN with methotrexate resistance unsuccessfully treated with avelumab, which achieved remission with sequential multiagent chemotherapy. The remaining 3 cases were high-risk multiagent-resistant GTN that were successfully treated with pembrolizumab, among which there were two subsequent gestations, one of them with normal pregnancy and healthy conceptus. Regarding the systematic review, 12 studies were included, only one of them on avelumab, showing a 46.7% complete remission rate. The remaining 11 studies were on pembrolizumab, showing an 86.7% complete remission rate, regardless of tumor histology. Both immunotherapies showed good tolerability, with two healthy pregnancies being recorded: one after avelumb and another after pembrolizumab. Conclusion Immunotherapy showed effectiveness for GTN treatment and may be especially useful in cases of high-risk disease, where pembrolizumab achieves a high therapeutic response, regardless of the histological type, and despite prior chemoresistance to multiple lines of treatment.